Mexico: the Other Side of the Wall

Hello to everyone and most particularly the students in my Politics of Mexico course this summer, both virtual and real time. The real time students are part of a study abroad experience. We will be in Mexico this summer from July 6 to July 21, studying the outcomes of the 2018 presidential elections in Mexico and producing a documentary on Mexican perspectives on politics, which we are calling "Mexico the Other Side of the Wall." I am hopeful that his blog will serve to connect the virtual and real time classes and give people access to commentary on political developments in Mexico.

I think about this project in relationship to the concept of the subaltern from post-colonial studies. The subaltern are subjugated groups, the victims of class domination, (neo)colonial domination, or both. Who cares about the subaltern? The subaltern exists in order to be acted upon, not to act in its own right. This is one way of making sense of the absence of Mexican perspectives from our discourses about trade, immigration, and the so called "war on drugs."

One might also say that this absence is a reflection of a certain national narcissism that exists in the U.S. - we are constantly gazing in the mirror of the mass media fascinated or perhaps horrified by our own reflection or by the political soap opera that is currently playing itself out in Washington. We are rarely concious of the perspective of the groups that we act upon. This is the story of Vietnam, Iraq, Mexico (I would contend) and many other places besides.

I will be posting posting muchas reflexiones sobre la politica Mexicana in the weeks to come. I hope that you will have occasion to read some of these.

Comments

Is the Exclusionary Nation State Justified?

Who gets to be part of a political community? More generally how should membership in a political community be determined? I would like to start by looking at this debate in theoretical terms and then, in a follow up post, consider how this debate is taking place today. Joseph Carens (1987) is an advocate for open borders, based on the idea that liberal ideas are universal in scope and limit government authority (of any territorial state) to keep people from being able to move around the earth as they choose. Michael Walzer (1983) develops a communitarian critique of liberalism, which insists on the primacy of community over individual rights and hence the right of communities to determine membership policy in whatever way they like. These arguments are rehearsed below. Walzer, “The Distribution of Membership” Walzer focuses on a fundamental question of rights. Not which rights ...

Movement of October 28

This blog post is a preliminary sketch of the October 28 Movement in Puebla, Mexico. I will start with some theoretical points of reference and then move on to discuss the movement. The sociologist William Robinson is a key theorist of globalization. He argues that globalization is shaped by a transnational capitalist class. In terms of theories of imperialism, this is very different from Lenin´s thesis of inter-imperialist rivalry. There is conflict between states in terms of how they position themselves within the global economy, a phenomena which can be understood in terms of the concept of the competitition state. But the primary lines of conflict in the world today are not between states, but between transnational capital and the great majority of people in the world whose livelihoods, communities and environments are uprooted, dislocated or destroyed by the encroachment of transnational circuits of capitalist accumulation. This is exactly what...

Guatemala: it is the model of development that must change

Here is a an interesting article by Giovani Batz in NACLA on the domination of indigenous peoples by Ladino landowners in Guatemala as the root of the U.S.’s immigration problem. What I particularly think is important here is the critique of the Obama era Alliance for Progress, overseen by Joe Biden, which Biden wants to continue and pass on to Kamala Harris. The program is founded on the pillars of good governance, development and security, where development means the system of unequal land ownership and racial/class domination that emerged in Guatemala in conjunction with that country's integration into the world market as a primary goods producer. The Alliance for Progress is similar to Plan Colombia and the Merida Initiative: both programs of militarized security that attempt to stabilize an imperialist model of development. Here is Biden writing in the New York Times in 2015: The economies of El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras remain bogged down as t...

Mexico: The Other Side of the Wall

Search This Blog